The rise of essay writing services: A reflection on their impact on student success
September 10, 2023
Analyze the purpose of Article 25 of the 1948 UDHR and the Constitution of the WHO.
September 10, 2023
Show all

Design Right – Class Assignments Help

Design Right – Class Assignments Help

Design RightThis part for the question that I have to completely answerThe concepts of “individual character”, “overall impression” and the” informed user” are the three key factors in determining whether a design is eligible for protection in the UK and in the European Union. Using relevant case law, critically examine how the Court of Justice of the European Union and the English Courts have interpreted and applied these three concepts.Remark90% of available marks will be allocated to the application of judicial decisions, judicial and academic comments to the topic under discussion and no limited writing style. You may present information in the way that best conveys your ability to analyse and apply your knowledge, understanding, and research.This part for detail in the program that it may be useful for answer the questionIntroduction to IP, IP exploitation; Confidentiality and Trade Secrets:Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1968] F.S.R. 415; [1969] R.P.C. 41; Ch DFaccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler [1987] Ch. 117Bailey v Graham ChD 25 November 2011VestergaardFrandsen A/S v BestNet Europe Ltd Chancery Division, 26 June 2009SocietaEsplosiviIndustrialiSpA v Ordnance Technologies (UK) Ltd (formerly SEI (UK) Ltd) [2007] EWHC 2875 (Ch); [2008] 2 All E.R. 622 (Ch D)Threeway Pressings Ltd’s Patent Application, Re, Patent Office, 20 March 2012 [2012] R.P.C. 20;Force India Formula One Team Ltd v 1 Malaysia Racing Team SdnBhdAlso known as: Force India Formula One Team Ltd v AerolabSrlCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)03 July 2013More informationThe appropriate chapter in your textbook +A critical evaluat of the proposed EU Trade Secrets Directive, IPQ 2014, 4, 257-279, Dr Tanya AplinTrade Secrets and Trade-Secret Licensing, A Handbook of Best Practices (eds A Krattiger, RT Mahoney, L Nelsen et al) MIHR, Oxford UK and PIPRA: Davis, U.S.A. 2007 Available online at www.ipHandbook.org, Karl F JordaTelevision formats: does English law adequately protect the industry and what can the industry do to protect itself? Entertainment Law Review 2013, AkashSachdeva, Jonathan McdonaldHow to protect trade secrets in high tech sports? An intellectual property analysis based on the experiences at the America’s Cup and in the Formula One Championship E.I.P.R. 2010, 32(4), 155-164?(Jacques de Werra)ExcerciseA critical evaluation of the proposed EU Trade Secrets Directive, Intellectual Property Quarterly 2014. Prof. Tanya Aplin*Registered & Unregistered DesignsWhitby Specialist Vehicals Ltd v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicals Ltd, [2014] EWHC 4242 (Pat)Samsung Electronics UK v Apple Inc [2012] EWHC 1882 (Pat)Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth, Supreme Court, 27 July 2011FlosSpA v Semeraro Casa e FamigliaSpA (C-168/09) European Court of Justice (Second Chamber), 27 January 2011PepsiCo Inc v GrupoPromer Mon-Graphic SA, Case C-281/10 P, European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber), 20 October 2011Green Lane Products Ltd v PMS International Group Plc [2008] EWCA Civ 358Dyson Ltd v Qualtex (UK) Ltd [2006] RPC 31Procter & Gamble Co v Reckitt Benckiser UK Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 936Lambretta Clothing Company Ltd v. Teddy Smith (UK) Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 886Farmers Build Ltd v Carier Bulk Materials Handling Ltd [2000] ECDR 42C. & H. Engineering v F. Klucznik& Sons Ltd [1992] FSR 421Ocular Science [1997] RPC 289More informationThe appropriate chapters in your textbook +Jane Cornwell, ‘Dyson and Samsung compared: functionality and aesthetics in the design infringement analysis’, European Intellectual Property Review (EIPR) 2013, 35(5)Lionel Bently’The return of industrial copyright?’, EIPR 2012, 34(10))Jose J. IzquierdoPeris’OHIM practice in the field of invalidity of registered Community designs’, EIPR 2008, 30(2)ACID (Anti Copying in Design) newsletters www.acid.eu.comCore texts• Bainbridge, Intellectual Property (Longman)• Colston& Galloway, Modern Intellectual Property Law (Routledge)• Cornish, Llewelyn&AplinIntellectual Property (Sweet & Maxwell)• Holyoak&Torremans, Intellectual Property Law (OUP)• Waelde, Laurie, Brown, Kheria, & Cornwell, Contemporary Intellectual Property: Law & Policy (OUP)Website and blog resourceswww.ipo.gov.ukwww.ep.espacenet.comhttp://www.bl.uk/pdf/patspec.pdfhttp://acid.eu.com/http://www.wipo.int/portal/index.html.enhttp://oami.europa.eu/en/default.htmhttp://ipkitten.blogspot.com/http://www.acid.eu.com/news/category/acid-in-print/http://class-99.blogspot.co.ukthe European Patent Office patent database. This is accessible from the Intellectual Property Office website, or via www.ep.espacenet.com

Rate this post

"Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you with a guaranteed plagiarism-free A+ quality paper. Discount Code: SUPER50!"

order custom paper